March 2, 2009

Mere Comments directed me to this post by Paul Johnson that presents an appreciative and insightful view of Charles Darwin the man and raises questions about his theory that seem important. Much rubbish is currently being published about Darwin as a ‘super-scientist’ and ‘transcendental prophet of the humanist triumph’ (two expressions I have noted in […]

Balance implies equality and it’s static. More often, we need integration, which is dynamic. Integration implies purpose. Balancing your life is usually good. Integrating it is always good – it’s better. Same with your teaching, reading, planning, cooking, etc.