A while back I made my curmudgeonly case for the Oxford Comma (the comma before “and” in a series of three or more). If you love sound reasoning and clear communication, you probably have a minor hang-up on this usage as well.
Here’s an article from Canada’s Globe and Mail by one who disagrees with me but has the courtesy to win the argument on my behalf.
Related articles
- Comma Drama Ends: Oxford Rule Stands (newser.com)
- Attacking the Serial Comma (lewrockwell.com)
- Oxford comma, still with us (economist.com)
